CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Comparison of ITS1 and ITS2 rDNA in 454 sequencing of hyperdiverse fungal communities

by: Anna L. Bazzicalupo, Miklós Bálint, Imke Schmitt
Fungal Ecology, Vol. 6, No. 1. (February 2013), pp. 102-109, doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2012.09.003  Key: citeulike:11961315

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Next-generation amplicon sequencing is a powerful tool in ecological studies of fungi. Technological development suggests that short fragment high-throughput techniques, e.g. Illumina, will gain importance in fungal community analyses. Thus there is a need for short (250 bp) and informative molecular identifiers. Here we compared ITS1 vs. ITS2 rDNA using empirical data from a study of hyperdiverse leaf-associated fungal communities. Our results suggest that ITS2 may be more variable and recovers more of the molecular diversity. We confirm an earlier in silico study showing that ITS1 and ITS2 yielded somewhat different taxonomic community compositions when blasted against public databases. However, we demonstrate that both ITS1 and ITS2 reveal similar patterns in community structure when analyzed in a community ecology context. ⺠We compared ITS1 and ITS2 for metabarcoding studies of complex fungal communities. ⺠We analyzed the performance if these fragments for three questions typical in fungal ecology. ⺠We found strong differences between the taxonomic assignments based on ITS1 and ITS2. ⺠ITS2 recovered higher operational taxonomic richness. ⺠Both fragments performed equally well when evaluating community structures.


anjulili's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.