Cohomology in Grothendieck Topologies and Lower Bounds in Boolean Complexity Export

@misc{citeulike:452581, abstract = {This paper is motivated by questions such as P vs. NP and other questions in Boolean complexity theory. We describe an approach to attacking such questions with cohomology, and we show that using Grothendieck topologies and other ideas from the Grothendieck school gives new hope for such an attack. We focus on circuit depth complexity, and consider only finite topological spaces or Grothendieck topologies based on finite categories; as such, we do not use algebraic geometry or manifolds. Given two sheaves on a Grothendieck topology, their "cohomological complexity" is the sum of the dimensions of their Ext groups. We seek to model the depth complexity of Boolean functions by the cohomological complexity of sheaves on a Grothendieck topology. We propose that the logical AND of two Boolean functions will have its corresponding cohomological complexity bounded in terms of those of the two functions using ``virtual zero extensions.'' We propose that the logical negation of a function will have its corresponding cohomological complexity equal to that of the original function using duality theory. We explain these approaches and show that they are stable under pullbacks and base change. It is the subject of ongoing work to achieve AND and negation bounds simultaneously in a way that yields an interesting depth lower bound.}, archivePrefix = {arXiv}, author = {Friedman, Joel}, citeulike-article-id = {452581}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0512008}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0512008}, day = {2}, eprint = {cs/0512008}, keywords = {algebraic-topology, complexity, grothendieck}, month = {Dec}, posted-at = {2005-12-29 13:40:01}, priority = {2}, title = {Cohomology in Grothendieck Topologies and Lower Bounds in Boolean Complexity}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0512008}, year = {2005} }

TY - ELEC ID - citeulike:452581 L3 - citeulike-article-id:452581 N2 - This paper is motivated by questions such as P vs. NP and other questions in Boolean complexity theory. We describe an approach to attacking such questions with cohomology, and we show that using Grothendieck topologies and other ideas from the Grothendieck school gives new hope for such an attack. We focus on circuit depth complexity, and consider only finite topological spaces or Grothendieck topologies based on finite categories; as such, we do not use algebraic geometry or manifolds. Given two sheaves on a Grothendieck topology, their "cohomological complexity" is the sum of the dimensions of their Ext groups. We seek to model the depth complexity of Boolean functions by the cohomological complexity of sheaves on a Grothendieck topology. We propose that the logical AND of two Boolean functions will have its corresponding cohomological complexity bounded in terms of those of the two functions using ``virtual zero extensions.'' We propose that the logical negation of a function will have its corresponding cohomological complexity equal to that of the original function using duality theory. We explain these approaches and show that they are stable under pullbacks and base change. It is the subject of ongoing work to achieve AND and negation bounds simultaneously in a way that yields an interesting depth lower bound. TI - Cohomology in Grothendieck Topologies and Lower Bounds in Boolean Complexity KW - algebraic-topology KW - complexity KW - grothendieck AU - Friedman, Joel PY - 2005/Dec/02/ UR - http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0512008 ER -