CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies Export

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, No. 41. (13 October 2009), pp. 17377-17382.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


apaydin's tags for this article

alignment structural

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

10.1073/pnas.0907971106 It has become increasingly apparent that geometric relationships often exist between regions of two proteins that have quite different global topologies or folds. In this article, we examine whether such relationships can be used to infer a functional connection between the two proteins in question. We find, by considering a number of examples involving metal and cation binding, sugar binding, and aromatic group binding, that geometrically similar protein fragments can share related functions, even if they have been classified as belonging to different folds and topologies. Thus, the use of classifications inevitably limits the number of functional inferences that can be obtained from the comparative analysis of protein structures. In contrast, the development of interactive computational tools that recognize the âcontinuousâ nature of protein structure/function space, by increasing the number of potentially meaningful relationships that are considered, may offer a dramatic enhancement in the ability to extract information from protein structure databases. We introduce the MarkUs server, that embodies this strategy and that is designed for a user interested in developing and validating specific functional hypotheses.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.