![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
ashko's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architectureby: A. Odgaard
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleID: 33; Journal English Review ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC 37 APR WT610 NEW YORK Odgaard A AARHUS UNIV HOSP,ORTHOPAED RES LAB,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,BYGNING 1A,DK-8000 AARHUS C,DENMARK BONE 655 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10010; RP: IN FILE
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractRecent development in three-dimensional (3-D) imaging of cancellous bone has made possible true 3-D quantification of trabecular architecture, This provides a significant improvement of the tools available for studying and understanding the mechanical functions of cancellous bone, This article reviews the different techniques for 3-D imaging, which include serial sectioning, X-ray tomographic methods, and NMR scanning, Basic architectural features of cancellous bone are discussed, and it is argued that connectivity and architectural anisotropy (fabric) are of special interest in mechanics- architecture relations, A full characterization of elastic mechanical properties is, with traditional mechanical testing, virtually impossible, but 3-D reconstruction in combination with newly developed methods for large-scale finite element analysis allow calculations of all elastic properties at the cancellous bone continuum level, Connectivity has traditionally been approached by various 2-D methods, but none of these methods have any known relation to 3-D connectivity, A topological approach allows unbiased quantification of connectivity, and this further allows expressions of the mean size of individual trabeculae, which has previously also been approached by a number of uncertain 2-D methods. Anisotropy may be quantified by fundamentally different methods, The well- known mean intercept length method is an interface-based method, whereas the volume orientation method is representative of volume based methods. Recent studies indicate that volume- based methods are at least as good as interface-based methods in predicting mechanical anisotropy, Any other architectural property may be quantified from 3-D reconstructions of cancellous bone specimens as long as an explicit definition of the property can be given, This challenges intuitive and vaguely defined architectural properties and forces bone scientists toward 3-D thinking. (C) 1997 by Elsevier Science Inc
BibTeX record
RIS record