CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Research issues and strategies for genomic and proteomic biomarker discovery and validation: a statistical perspective.

by: Ziding Feng, Ross Prentice, Sudir Srivastava
Pharmacogenomics, Vol. 5, No. 6. (September 2004), pp. 709-719, doi:10.1517/14622416.5.6.709  Key: citeulike:7084215

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The development and validation of clinically useful biomarkers from high-dimensional genomic and proteomic information pose great research challenges. Present bottlenecks include: that few of the biomarkers showing promise in initial discovery were found to warrant subsequent validation; and biomarker validation is expensive and time consuming. Biomarker evaluation should proceed in an orderly fashion to enhance rigor and efficiency. A molecular profiling approach, although promising, has a high chance of yielding biased results and overfitted models. Specimens from cohorts or intervention trials are essential to eliminate biases. The high cost for biomarker validation motivates some novel study design features, including sequential filtering and DNA pooling. For data analysis, logistic regression (in particular, boosting logistic regression) has features of robustness against model misspecification, and has resistance to model overfitting. Model assessment and cross-validation are critical components of data analysis. Having an independent test set is a vital feature of study design.


austin987's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.