Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited Export

@article{citeulike:738207, abstract = {John Swales's 1986 article Citation analysis and discourse analysis' was written by a discourse analyst to introduce citation research from other fields, mainly sociology of science, to his own discipline. Here, I introduce applied linguists and discourse analysts to citation studies from information science, a complementary tradition not emphasized by Swales. Using replicable biblio-metric techniques, I show that interdisciplinary ties have grown among citation researchers from discourse analysis, sociology of science, and information science in the years since Swales wrote. Key authors, journals, articles, and books are presented in tables based on cocitation data from the Institute for Scientific Information. While theoretical integration of the different strands of research is far from complete, this article carries the effort forward by reviewing contributions from the 1970s to the present in three major lines of research: citation classification, content analysis of citation contexts, and studies of citer motivations. I pay particular attention to ideas that bear on teaching the art of citing--for example, in courses in English for research purposes--and to controversies in citation research of interest to discourse analysts. 10.1093/applin/25.1.89}, author = {White, Howard D.}, citeulike-article-id = {738207}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/1/89}, comment = {White HD. Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited. Applied Linguistics. 2004 March;25(1):89-116. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89.}, day = {1}, doi = {10.1093/applin/25.1.89}, journal = {Applied Linguistics}, keywords = {analysis, article, articles, author, author-impact, author-influence, author\_impact, author\_influence, authorities, authority, authors, bibliography, bibliometrics, biomedical, central, centrality, citation, citation-analysis, citation\_analysis, citationanalysis, citations, co-authorship, co-citation, co-citations, connections, contribution, discourse, discourse-analysis, discourse\_analysis, expert, experts, graphing, highly-cited, impact, impact-factor, impact\_factor, index, indices, influence, influential, key\_opinion\_leader, keyopinionleader, kol, kols, leader, leaders, literature, mapping, medical, medicine, metrics, paper, performance, physicians, pub, publications, pubs, quality, ranking, researchers, scientometrics, significance, sna, social, social-network-analysis, social\_network\_analysis, socialnetworks, thought-leader, thought\_leader, webliography, webliometrics, webmetrics, webometrics}, month = {March}, number = {1}, pages = {89--116}, posted-at = {2007-11-15 05:05:18}, priority = {4}, title = {Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89}, volume = {25}, year = {2004} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:738207 L3 - citeulike-article-id:738207 N2 - John Swales's 1986 article Citation analysis and discourse analysis' was written by a discourse analyst to introduce citation research from other fields, mainly sociology of science, to his own discipline. Here, I introduce applied linguists and discourse analysts to citation studies from information science, a complementary tradition not emphasized by Swales. Using replicable biblio-metric techniques, I show that interdisciplinary ties have grown among citation researchers from discourse analysis, sociology of science, and information science in the years since Swales wrote. Key authors, journals, articles, and books are presented in tables based on cocitation data from the Institute for Scientific Information. While theoretical integration of the different strands of research is far from complete, this article carries the effort forward by reviewing contributions from the 1970s to the present in three major lines of research: citation classification, content analysis of citation contexts, and studies of citer motivations. I pay particular attention to ideas that bear on teaching the art of citing--for example, in courses in English for research purposes--and to controversies in citation research of interest to discourse analysts. 10.1093/applin/25.1.89 IS - 1 JF - Applied Linguistics EP - 116 TI - Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited VL - 25 SP - 89 KW - analysis KW - article KW - articles KW - author KW - author-impact KW - author-influence KW - author_impact KW - author_influence KW - authorities KW - authority KW - authors KW - bibliography KW - bibliometrics KW - biomedical KW - central KW - centrality KW - citation KW - citation-analysis KW - citation_analysis KW - citationanalysis KW - citations KW - co-authorship KW - co-citation KW - co-citations KW - connections KW - contribution KW - discourse KW - discourse-analysis KW - discourse_analysis KW - expert KW - experts KW - graphing KW - highly-cited KW - impact KW - impact-factor KW - impact_factor KW - index KW - indices KW - influence KW - influential KW - key_opinion_leader KW - keyopinionleader KW - kol KW - kols KW - leader KW - leaders KW - literature KW - mapping KW - medical KW - medicine KW - metrics KW - paper KW - performance KW - physicians KW - pub KW - publications KW - pubs KW - quality KW - ranking KW - researchers KW - scientometrics KW - significance KW - sna KW - social KW - social-network-analysis KW - social_network_analysis KW - socialnetworks KW - thought-leader KW - thought_leader KW - webliography KW - webliometrics KW - webmetrics KW - webometrics N1 - White HD. Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited. Applied Linguistics. 2004 March;25(1):89-116. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89. AU - White, Howard PY - 2004/03/01/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89 ER -