CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Reconsidering the null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models Export

(14 Aug 2008)

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


b's tags for this article

genes stats

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Accurate knowledge of the null distribution of hypothesis tests is important for valid application of the tests. In previous papers and software, the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for detecting genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models has been stated to be a mixture of chi-square distributions with binomial mixing probabilities. Here we show, by simulation and by theoretical arguments based on the geometry of the parameter space, that all aspects of the previously stated asymptotic null distribution are incorrect-both the binomial mixing probabilities and the chi-square components. The true mixing probabilities give the highest probability to the case where all variance parameters are estimated positive, and mixing proportions and critical values depend on unknown nuisance parameters. Correcting the null distribution gives more conservative critical values than previously stated, yielding P values that can easily be ten times larger. We conclude that significance assessments should be done by empirical methods based on given data. In an example application to a simulated data set, we illustrate three well known methods for obtaining empirical P-values and compare their results on our data set.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.