CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Selective archiving of web resources: a study of processing costs Export

Program: electronic library and information systems, Vol. 42, No. 4. (2008), pp. 341-364.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Home > Browse > Article Request E-mail this page Article Request: Selective archiving of web resources: a study of processing costs Add to the marked list: Article Information: Title: Selective archiving of web resources: a study of processing costs Author(s): Mirna Willer, Tanja Buzina, Karolina Holub, Jasenka Zajec, Miroslav Milinovic, Nebojsa Topolscak Journal: Program: electronic library and information systems Year: 2008 Volume: 42 Issue: 4 Page: 341 - 364 DOI: 10.1108/00330330810912043 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank the colleagues who took part in this assessment exercise: Hrvoje Brozovic (IT Department), Danijela Getliher and Renata Petrušic (ISSN), Sofija Klarin (Croatian Institute for Librarianship, Project member), Tatjana Mihalic (Music collection), Robert Ravnic (Authority Control Department), Ingeborg Rudomino (UPWR), Tomica Vrbanc (CIP Unit) and Mirjana Vujic (Subject and Classification Department) from the National and University Library, and Mijo Åerek from the University of Zagreb Computing Centre (SRCE). Document Access: Please select from the following options: View HTML | View PDF (362 KB) Reprints & permissions: Image: Rightslink Request Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess costs in the National and University Library of Croatia for processing Croatian web resources and the maintenance and development of the service, and to analyse the present organisation and workflow of their processing, and to propose improvements. Design/methodology/approach – The assessment period was two months, during which the members of staff involved minutely monitored their tasks. The results were compared to the same exercise reported by the National Library of Australia and processing costs of cataloguing Croatian print publications. Findings – The bottom-up analysis of processing web resources shows that a balanced description of tasks and their distribution over staff members was established, and that the present workflow meets the requirements of efficient processing of web resources. As a general finding, approximately the same time was spent on archiving new items, as on the control and maintenance of the already archived ones due to the change of web resource properties, URL instability and the changes of technology. The comparative analysis showed: less time is spent on identification and selection and publishers' contacts on the part of the Croatian National Library compared to the Australian one; almost twice as much time was spent on gathering, quality assurance, and archiving instances in the Australian case than in the Croatian one; practically the same time was spent on cataloguing in both cases; and compared to cataloguing of print publications, significantly less time was spent on the print ones. Originality/value – The paper is one of the two published articles on the in depth analysis of the workflow and processing costs of managing and selectively archiving legal deposit copies of web resources in a national library. Its potential value is in drawing attention of library managers of those institutions that deal with selective web archiving to assess costs and services in view of the legal obligations of libraries for preserving national cultural web heritage and meeting present and future users' needs.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.