![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
bfraser's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
On the relation of aspects and monadsIn FOAL '07: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on Foundations of aspect-oriented languages (2007), pp. 27-33.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe relation between aspects and monads is a recurring topic in discussions in the programming language community, although it has never been elaborated whether their resemblences are only superficial, and if not, where they are rooted. The aim of this paper is to contrast both mechanisms w.r.t. their capabilities and their effects on modularity, first by looking at monads as a way to express tangling concerns in functional programming and by discussing whether they can be regarded as a form of AOP, then by taking the view that monads express concerns of computations and by analyzing the extent to which aspects are able to handle those concerns.
BibTeX record
RIS record