A comparison of protein quantitation assays for biopharmaceutical applications. Export

@article{citeulike:3406895, abstract = {Dye-based protein determination assays are widely used to estimate protein concentration, however various reports suggest that the response is dependent on the composition and sequence of the protein, limiting confidence in the resulting concentration estimates. In this study a diverse set of model proteins representing various sizes of protein and covalent modifications, some typical of biopharmaceuticals have been used to assess the utility of dye-based protein concentration assays. The protein concentration assays (Bicinchoninic acid (BCA), Bradford, 3-(4-carboxybenzoyl)quinoline-2-carboxaldehyde (CBQCA), DC, Fluorescamine and Quant-i) were compared to the 'gold standard' assay, quantitative amino acid analysis (AAA). The assays that displayed the lowest variability between proteins, BCA and DC, also generated improved estimates when BSA was used as a standard, when compared to AAA derived concentrations. Assays read out by absorbance tended to display enhanced robustness and repeatability, whereas the fluorescence based assays had wider quantitation ranges and lower limits of detection. Protein modification, in the form of glycosylation and PEGylation, and the addition of excipients, were found to affect the estimation of protein concentration for some of the assays when compared to the unmodified protein. We discuss the suitability and limitations of the selected assays for the estimation of protein concentration in biopharmaceutical applications.}, author = {Noble, J. E. and Knight, A. E. and Reason, A. J. and Di Matola, A. and Bailey, M. J.}, citeulike-article-id = {3406895}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17914170}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17914170}, issn = {1073-6085}, journal = {Molecular biotechnology}, keywords = {assay, concentration, protein}, month = {October}, number = {2}, pages = {99--111}, posted-at = {2009-09-14 16:14:27}, priority = {2}, title = {A comparison of protein quantitation assays for biopharmaceutical applications.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17914170}, volume = {37}, year = {2007} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3406895 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3406895 N2 - Dye-based protein determination assays are widely used to estimate protein concentration, however various reports suggest that the response is dependent on the composition and sequence of the protein, limiting confidence in the resulting concentration estimates. In this study a diverse set of model proteins representing various sizes of protein and covalent modifications, some typical of biopharmaceuticals have been used to assess the utility of dye-based protein concentration assays. The protein concentration assays (Bicinchoninic acid (BCA), Bradford, 3-(4-carboxybenzoyl)quinoline-2-carboxaldehyde (CBQCA), DC, Fluorescamine and Quant-i) were compared to the 'gold standard' assay, quantitative amino acid analysis (AAA). The assays that displayed the lowest variability between proteins, BCA and DC, also generated improved estimates when BSA was used as a standard, when compared to AAA derived concentrations. Assays read out by absorbance tended to display enhanced robustness and repeatability, whereas the fluorescence based assays had wider quantitation ranges and lower limits of detection. Protein modification, in the form of glycosylation and PEGylation, and the addition of excipients, were found to affect the estimation of protein concentration for some of the assays when compared to the unmodified protein. We discuss the suitability and limitations of the selected assays for the estimation of protein concentration in biopharmaceutical applications. IS - 2 JF - Molecular biotechnology SN - 1073-6085 EP - 111 TI - A comparison of protein quantitation assays for biopharmaceutical applications. VL - 37 SP - 99 KW - assay KW - concentration KW - protein AU - Noble, JE AU - Knight, AE AU - Reason, AJ AU - Di Matola, A AU - Bailey, MJ PY - 2007/10// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17914170 ER -