CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Integration of Syntactic and Semantic Information in Predictive Processing: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from German and English Export

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 32, No. 1. (1 January 2003), pp. 37-55.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


briordan's tags for this article

eye-movements grammatical-number sentence-comprehension visual-world-paradigm

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

briordan has 1 private note and 0 public notes for this article. If you are briordan then you can log in to see the private note.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Two visual-world eyetracking experiments were conducted to investigate whether, how, and when syntactic and semantic constraints are integrated and used to predict properties of subsequent input. Experiment 1 contrasted auditory German constructions such as, “The hare-nominative eats ... (the cabbage-acc)” versus “The hare-accusative eats ... (the fox-nom),” presented with a picture containing a hare, fox, cabbage, and distractor. We found that the probabilities of the eye movements to the cabbage and fox before the onset of NP2 were modulated by the case-marking of NP1, indicating that the case-marking (syntactic) information and verbs' semantic constraints are integrated rapidly enough to predict the most plausible NP2 in the scene. Using English versions of the same stimuli in active/passive voice (Experiment 2), we replicated the same effect, but at a slightly earlier position in the sentence. We discuss the discrepancies in the two Germanic languages in terms of the ease of integrating information across, or within, constituents.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.