CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference Export

Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 63, No. 5. (1990), pp. 325-336.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


bsilverthorn's tags for this article

correlation_length fitness_landscapes

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

bsilverthorn has 1 private note and 0 public notes for this article. If you are bsilverthorn then you can log in to see the private note.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The properties of multi-peaked “fitness landscapes” have attracted attention in a wide variety of fields, including evolutionary biology. However, relaively little attention has been paid to the properties of the landscapes themselves. Herein, we suggest a framework for the mathematical treatment of such landscapes, including an explicit mathematical model. A central role in this discussion is played by the autocorrelation of fitnesses obtained from a random walk on the landscape. Our ideas about average autocorrelations allow us to formulate a condition (satisfied by a wide class of landscapes we call AR(1) landscapes) under which the average autocorrelation approximates a decaying exponential. We then show how our mathematical model can be used to estimate both the globally optimal fitnesses of AR(1) landscapes and their local structure. We illustrate some aspects of our method with computer experiments based on a single family of landscapes (Kauffman's “N-k model”), that is shown to be a generic AR(1) landscape. We close by discussing how these ideas might be useful in the “tuning” of combinatorial optimization algorithms, and in modelling in the experimental sciences.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.