CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Artificial gene networks for objective comparison of analysis algorithms Export

Bioinformatics In Bioinformatics, Vol. 19, No. suppl_2. (27 September 2003), pp. ii122-129.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


camster's tags for this article

artificial cov_matrix mendes training

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Motivation: Large-scale gene expression profiling generates data sets that are rich in observed features but poor in numbers of observations. The analysis of such data sets is a challenge that has been object of vigorous research. The algorithms in use for this purpose have been poorly documented and rarely compared objectively, posing a problem of uncertainty about the outcomes of the analyses. One way to objectively test such analysis algorithms is to apply them on computational gene network models for which the mechanisms are completely know. Results: We present a system that generates random artificial gene networks according to well-defined topological and kinetic properties. These are used to run in silico experiments simulating real laboratory microarray experiments. Noise with controlled properties is added to the simulation results several times emulating measurement replicates, before expression ratios are calculated. Availability: The data sets and kinetic models described here are available from http://www.vbi.vt.edu/~mendes/AGN/as biochemical dynamic models in SBML and Gepasi formats. Contact: mendes@vt.edu 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1069


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.