Please help support CiteULike by taking part in our marketing survey.
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Memory latency in distributed shared-memory multiprocessors Export

Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Southeastcon (24 - 26 April 1998), pp. 134-137.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Analytical models were developed and simulations of memory latency were performed for Uniform Memory Access (UMA), Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA), Local-Remote-Global (LRG), and Replicated Concurrent-Read (RCR) architectures for hit rates from 0.1 to 0.9 in steps of 0.1, memory access times of 10 nsec to 100 nsec, proportions of read/write access from 0.01 to 0.1, and block sizes of 8 to 64 words. The RCR architecture based on redundant inexpensive DRAM is shown to provide favourable performance over UMA and NUMA architectures for application and system parameters in the range evaluated. RCR outperforms LRG architectures when the hit rates of the processor cache exceed 80% and hit rates of replicated memory exceed 25%. Inclusion of a small replicated memory at each processor significantly reduces expected access time since all replicated memory READ access hits become independent of global traffic. For configurations of up to 32 processors, results show that latency is further reduced by distinguishing burst-mode transfers between isolated memory accesses and those which are incrementally outside the working set


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.