CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Combating spam in tagging systems: An evaluation Export

ACM Trans. Web, Vol. 2, No. 4. (2008), pp. 1-34.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


cgl's tags for this article

annotation isi ls reliability spam

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

cgl has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

taggers' reliability kısmı okunacak

cgl (public note) - 2009-11-12 21:02:52

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Tagging systems allow users to interactively annotate a pool of shared resources using descriptive strings called tags . Tags are used to guide users to interesting resources and help them build communities that share their expertise and resources. As tagging systems are gaining in popularity, they become more susceptible to tag spam : misleading tags that are generated in order to increase the visibility of some resources or simply to confuse users. Our goal is to understand this problem better. In particular, we are interested in answers to questions such as: How many malicious users can a tagging system tolerate before results significantly degrade? What types of tagging systems are more vulnerable to malicious attacks? What would be the effort and the impact of employing a trusted moderator to find bad postings? Can a system automatically protect itself from spam, for instance, by exploiting user tag patterns? In a quest for answers to these questions, we introduce a framework for modeling tagging systems and user tagging behavior. We also describe a method for ranking documents matching a tag based on taggers' reliability. Using our framework, we study the behavior of existing approaches under malicious attacks and the impact of a moderator and our ranking method.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.