|
Home
News
Citegeist
|
Browse Groups
Search Groups
Journals
|
FAQs
Howto
Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for color and textureComputer Vision, 1999. The Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on In Computer Vision, 1999. The Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 2 (1999), pp. 1165-1172 vol.2.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting HistoryNEW
AbstractThis paper empirically compares nine image dissimilarity measures that are based on distributions of color and texture features summarizing over 1,000 CPU hours of computational experiments. Ground truth is collected via a novel random sampling scheme for color and via an image partitioning method for texture. Quantitative performance evaluations are given for classification, image retrieval, and segmentation tasks, and for a wide variety of dissimilarity measures. It is demonstrated how the selection of a measure, based on large scale evaluation, substantially improves the quality of classification, retrieval, and unsupervised segmentation of color and texture images
BibTeX record
RIS record