![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
ciga's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Why Least Squares and Maximum Entropy? An Axiomatic Approach to Inference for Linear Inverse Problemsby: Imre Csiszar
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractAn attempt is made to determine the logically consistent rules for selecting a vector from any feasible set defined by linear constraints, when either all n-vectors or those with positive components or the probability vectors are permissible. Some basic postulates are satisfied if and only if the selection rule is to minimize a certain function which, if a "prior guess" is available, is a measure of distance from the prior guess. Two further natural postulates restrict the permissible distances to the author's f-divergences and Bregman's divergences, respectively. As corollaries, axiomatic characterizations of the methods of least squares and minimum discrimination information are arrived at. Alternatively, the latter are also characterized by a postulate of composition consistency. As a special case, a derivation of the method of maximum entropy from a small set of natural axioms is obtained.
BibTeX record
RIS record