How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards Export

@article{citeulike:1278073, abstract = {Filing charges of scientific misconduct can be a risky and dangerous endeavor. This article presents rules of conduct to follow when considering whether to report perceived misconduct, and a set of step-by-step procedures for responsible whistleblowing that describe how to do so once the decision to report misconduct has been made. This advice is framed within the university setting, and may not apply fully in industrial settings.}, author = {Gunsalus, C. K.}, citeulike-article-id = {1278073}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://www.opragen.co.uk/SEE/abstract.php3?id=55}, journal = {Science and Engineering Ethics}, keywords = {ire, misconduct, research-ethics, taskr}, number = {1}, pages = {51--64}, posted-at = {2009-04-20 01:25:24}, priority = {2}, title = {How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards}, url = {http://www.opragen.co.uk/SEE/abstract.php3?id=55}, volume = {4}, year = {1998} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1278073 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1278073 N2 - Filing charges of scientific misconduct can be a risky and dangerous endeavor. This article presents rules of conduct to follow when considering whether to report perceived misconduct, and a set of step-by-step procedures for responsible whistleblowing that describe how to do so once the decision to report misconduct has been made. This advice is framed within the university setting, and may not apply fully in industrial settings. IS - 1 JF - Science and Engineering Ethics EP - 64 TI - How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards VL - 4 SP - 51 KW - ire KW - misconduct KW - research-ethics KW - taskr AU - Gunsalus, CK PY - 1998/// UR - http://www.opragen.co.uk/SEE/abstract.php3?id=55 ER -