CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Robust covariance estimates based on resampling Export

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference In Robust Statistics and Data Analysis, Part II, Vol. 57, No. 2. (1 February 1997), pp. 321-334.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


ctacmo's tags for this article

bootstrap jackknife multivariate resampling_inference

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Many asymptotic covariance estimates are generated using uncontaminated model distributions and thus are often based in part on the information matrix. Such covariance estimators have a low breakdown point (Donoho and Huber, 1983; Huber, 1981; Hampel et al., 1986, p. 98; Lopuhaa and Rousseeuw, 1991), even if the estimate itself has a high breakdown point. These covariance estimates will not be reliable when there are outliers present. As alternative estimates of variability for robust estimators, we consider using the bootstrapped or jackknifed sample covariance matrix. As will be shown in this paper, the bootstrapped sample covariance matrix can have a breakdown point of 1/n regardless of the breakdown point of the estimator; thus both bootstrapped and asymptotic covariance estimates may be heavily influenced by outliers even if the original estimate is not. This is not the case for the jackknifed sample covariance matrix. If an estimate is not heavily influenced by outliers, its jackknifed sample covariance estimate is not likely to be heavily influenced by outliers. On the other hand, the jackknife, but not the bootstrap, may have a low breakdown point because the covariance estimate can often be shifted to zero by shifting a few points.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.