CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Energetics of a Suburban Lawn Ecosystem Export

Ecology, Vol. 57, No. 1. (1976), pp. 141-150.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


cuyjet's tags for this article

california ecosystem energetics energy-budget grassland grassland-management lawn productivity suburban urban

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

cuyjet has 1 private note and 0 public notes for this article. If you are cuyjet then you can log in to see the private note.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

A study of the energetics of a sururban lawn was conducted in 1972-73 in Walnut Creek, California USA. Several major components of the annual primary and secondary production were measured, including man's role as manager and experimenter in the system. The system was extremely productive with net productivity of 1,020 g/m^2 per yr compared to cornfields with productivity of 1,066 g/m^2 per yr and exceeding tall grass prairie values of around 1,000 g/m^2 per yr. Homopterans, with maximal values of 19 mg/m^2 were plentiful; other typical grassland species, like Araneida, were scarce, representing only 1% by weight of the total invertebrate population. Food utilization per unit area by suburban birds considerably exceeded natural grassland bird utilization (46 kcal/m^2 per yr vs. 1.01-2.33 kcal/m^2 per yr); lawns are ideal foraging sites for open area adapted, flock-feeding species. Man was the dominant consumer in the community, accounting for 10% of the herbivory and nearly 100% of the scavenging. Energy inputs (labor, gasoline, fertilizer, etc.) amounted to 578 kcal/m"2 per yr, equalling or exceeding corn production for a comparable net productivity, but not necessarily utilitarian return.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.