Nature's trial of open peer review Export

@article{Greaves06, abstract = {Despite enthusiasm for the concept, open peer review was not widely popular, either among authors or by scientists invited to comment.}, author = {Greaves, Sarah and Scott, Joanna and Clarke, Maxine and Miller, Linda and Hannay, Timo and Thomas, Annette and Campbell, Philip}, citeulike-article-id = {1727154}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1038/nature05535}, doi = {doi:10.1038/nature05535}, journal = {Nature}, keywords = {peer\_review, web}, month = {December}, posted-at = {2007-10-04 13:40:17}, priority = {0}, title = {Nature's trial of open peer review}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1038/nature05535}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - Greaves06 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1727154 N2 - Despite enthusiasm for the concept, open peer review was not widely popular, either among authors or by scientists invited to comment. JF - Nature TI - Nature's trial of open peer review KW - peer_review KW - web AU - Greaves, Sarah AU - Scott, Joanna AU - Clarke, Maxine AU - Miller, Linda AU - Hannay, Timo AU - Thomas, Annette AU - Campbell, Philip PY - 2006/12// UR - http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1038/nature05535 ER -