CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Plagiarized bacterial genes in the human book of life Export

Trends in Genetics, Vol. 17, No. 5. (1 May 2001), pp. 235-237.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


dayjm's tags for this article

bacterial eukaryal evolution genomics

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The initial analysis of the human genome draft sequence reveals that our `book of life' is multi-authored. A small but significant proportion of our genes owes their heritage not to antecedent eukaryotes but instead to bacteria. The publicly funded Human Genome Project study indicates that about 0.5% of all human genes were copied into the genome from bacterial sources. Detailed sequence analyses point to these `horizontal gene transfer' events having occurred relatively recently. So how did the human `book of life' evolve to be a chimaera, part animal and part bacterium? And what was the probable evolutionary impact of such gene plagiarism?


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.