![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
dcastro's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Comparative study of turbo equalization schemes using convolutional, convolutional turbo, and block-turbo codesWireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on In Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 1, No. 2. (2002), pp. 266-273.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractTurbo equalizers have been shown to be successful in mitigating the effects of inter-symbol interference introduced by partial response modems and by dispersive channels for code rates of R⩽ 1/2. We comparatively studied the performance of a range of binary phase-shift keying turbo equalizers employing block-turbo codes, namely Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghen (1960, 1959) turbo codes, convolutional codes, and convolutional turbo codes having high code rates, such as R=3/4 and R=5/6, over a dispersive five-path Gaussian channel and an equally weighted symbol-spaced five-path Rayleigh fading channel. These turbo equalization schemes were combined with an iterative channel estimation scheme in order to characterize a realistic scenario. The simulation results demonstrated that the turbo-equalized system using convolutional turbo codes was the most robust system for all code rates investigated
BibTeX record
RIS record