CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Influence of Shoot Structure on Light Interception and Photosynthesis in Conifers Export

Plant Physiol., Vol. 79, No. 4. (1 December 1985), pp. 1038-1043.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


ddasilva's tags for this article

clumping coniferous light-interception photosynthesis star

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The influence of shoot structure on net photosynthesis was evaluated under field conditions for the central Rocky Mountain (United States) conifers Picea engelmannii (Parry ex Engelm.), Abies lasiocarpa ([Hook] Nutt.), and Pinus contorta (Engelm.). In all species, the greater number of needles per unit stem length on sun shoots correlated with a smaller silhouette leaf area to total leaf area ratio (STAR). Decreased STAR was due primarily to greater needle inclination toward the vertical, plus some needle mutual shading. However, photosynthesis expressed on a total leaf area basis did not decrease in sun shoots (lower STAR) but remained nearly constant at approximately 3 micromoles per square meter per second over a wide range of STAR (0.1 to 0.3). Relatively low light saturation levels of 200 to 1400 microeinsteins per square meter per second and diffuse light to 350 microeinsteins per meter per second maintained photosynthetic flux densities in inclined and/or shaded needles at levels comparable to those in unshaded needles oriented perpendicular to the solar beam. As a result, net CO2 uptake per unit stem length increased as much as 2-fold in sun shoots (low STAR) in direct proportion to increasing needle density.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.