Variability in fMRI: A re-examination of inter-session differences Export

@article{citeulike:890179, abstract = {We revisit a previous study on inter-session variability (McGonigle et al. []: Neuroimage 11:708-734), showing that contrary to one popular interpretation of the original article, inter-session variability is not necessarily high. We also highlight how evaluating variability based on thresholded single-session images alone can be misleading. Finally, we show that the use of different first-level preprocessing, time-series statistics, and registration analysis methodologies can give significantly different inter-session analysis results. Hum. Brain Mapping 24:248-257, 2005. {\copyright} 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.}, address = {Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Department of Clinical Neurology, Oxford University, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Imagerie C\'{e}r\'{e}brale, H\^{o}pital de la Salp\^{e}tri\`{e}re, CNRS UPR 640-LENA, Paris, France}, author = {Smith, Stephen M. and Beckmann, Christian F. and Ramnani, Narender and Woolrich, Mark W. and Bannister, Peter R. and Jenkinson, Mark and Matthews, Paul M. and McGonigle, David J.}, citeulike-article-id = {890179}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20080}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15654698}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=15654698}, citeulike-linkout-3 = {http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/109865674/ABSTRACT}, doi = {10.1002/hbm.20080}, issn = {1097-0193}, journal = {Human Brain Mapping}, keywords = {fmri, methods, variability}, month = {March}, number = {3}, pages = {248--257}, posted-at = {2009-05-07 19:43:02}, priority = {2}, title = {Variability in fMRI: A re-examination of inter-session differences}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20080}, volume = {24}, year = {2005} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:890179 L3 - citeulike-article-id:890179 N2 - We revisit a previous study on inter-session variability (McGonigle et al. []: Neuroimage 11:708-734), showing that contrary to one popular interpretation of the original article, inter-session variability is not necessarily high. We also highlight how evaluating variability based on thresholded single-session images alone can be misleading. Finally, we show that the use of different first-level preprocessing, time-series statistics, and registration analysis methodologies can give significantly different inter-session analysis results. Hum. Brain Mapping 24:248-257, 2005. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. IS - 3 JF - Human Brain Mapping SN - 1097-0193 AD - Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Department of Clinical Neurology, Oxford University, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Imagerie Cérébrale, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, CNRS UPR 640-LENA, Paris, France EP - 257 TI - Variability in fMRI: A re-examination of inter-session differences VL - 24 SP - 248 KW - fmri KW - methods KW - variability AU - Smith, Stephen AU - Beckmann, Christian AU - Ramnani, Narender AU - Woolrich, Mark AU - Bannister, Peter AU - Jenkinson, Mark AU - Matthews, Paul AU - McGonigle, David PY - 2005/03// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20080 ER -