![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
deleon's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
The Four Subfields: Anthropologists as Mythmakersby: Robert Borofsky
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractA survey of articles published in the American Anthropologist over a 100-year period indicates that substantive collaboration across anthropological subfields is largely a myth<img style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold" align="BOTTOM" border="0" alt="" src="/na101/home/literatum/publisher/aaa/journals/entities/2014.gif"/>amounting toonly 311 of 3,264 articles surveyed (or 9.5 percent of the total). Working with the anthropological insights of Bronislaw Malinowski, Edward Tylor, and Claude Levi-Strauss, this article considers why a myth of subf ield collaboration nonetheless exists within anthropology. This article concludes by calling for new forms of holism. [Keywords: American Anthropologist, subf ield collaboration, holism, public anthropology]
BibTeX record
RIS record