CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Protein sequence comparison and fold recognition: progress and good-practice benchmarking.

by: Johannes Söding, Michael Remmert
Current opinion in structural biology, Vol. 21, No. 3. (31 June 2011), pp. 404-411, doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.005  Key: citeulike:9287512

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Protein sequence comparison methods have grown increasingly sensitive during the last decade and can often identify distantly related proteins sharing a common ancestor some 3 billion years ago. Although cellular function is not conserved so long, molecular functions and structures of protein domains often are. In combination with a domain-centered approach to function and structure prediction, modern remote homology detection methods have a great and largely underexploited potential for elucidating protein functions and evolution. Advances during the last few years include nonlinear scoring functions combining various sequence features, the use of sequence context information, and powerful new software packages. Since progress depends on realistically assessing new and existing methods and published benchmarks are often hard to compare, we propose 10 rules of good-practice benchmarking. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


dgront's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

Xnote Notes for this article (1 private)


X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.