CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

A Globally Consistent Richness‐Climate Relationship for Angiosperms. Export

The American Naturalist, Vol. 161, No. 4. (1 April 2003), pp. 523-536.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


dhodkinson's tags for this article

diversity plant test

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

doi: 10.1086/368223 PMID: 12776882 Species richness, the simplest index of biodiversity, varies greatly over broad spatial scales. Richness‐climate relationships often account for >80% of the spatial variance in richness. However, it has been suggested that richness‐climate relationships differ significantly among geographic regions and that there is no globally consistent relationship. This study investigated the global patterns of species and family richness of angiosperms in relation to climate. We found that models relating angiosperm richness to mean annual temperature, annual water deficit, and their interaction or models relating richness to annual potential evapotranspiration and water deficit are both globally consistent and very strong and are independent of the diverse evolutionary histories and functional assemblages of plants in different parts of the world. Thus, effects of other factors such as evolutionary history, postglacial dispersal, soil nutrients, topography, or other climatic variables either must be quite minor over broad scales (because there is little residual variation left to explain) or they must be strongly collinear with global patterns of climate. The correlations shown here must be predicted by any successful hypothesis of mechanisms controlling richness patterns.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.