This Note explores a battle for water in the Southwest that may ultimately destroy one of Arizona's most precious rivers. This struggle pits the doctrine of reasonable use against the doctrine of prior appropriation and exposes the need to reconcile the uniquely Arizonan concept of "subflow," which purports to synthesize the laws of ground and surface water, with scientific reality. The characters in this complicated battle include rural municipalities that plan to pump from the river's headwaters, a major metropolitan utility company with century-old rights to the river, and an environmental advocacy organization seeking to protect endangered species. The plight of the Verde River exemplifies what has become a common tale in the United States - multiple parties with valid rights to the same water under different laws. Its resolution will likely require some difficult decisions about resource allocation, rural and urban growth, and the courts' willingness to side with science in the face of impossibly high stakes and a river in peril.
Search
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
