![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
dmueller's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
The Fractal Geometry of Nature |
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleFrom Taylor's _Moment of Complexity_: "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not circles, and bak is not smooth nor does light travel in a straight line" (40d).
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractImagine an equilateral triangle. Now, imagine smaller equilateral triangles perched in the center of each side of the original triangle--you have a Star of David. Now, place still smaller equilateral triangles in the center of each of the star's 12 sides. Repeat this process infinitely and you have a Koch snowflake, a mind-bending geometric figure with an infinitely large perimeter, yet with a finite area. This is an example of the kind of mathematical puzzles that this book addresses.<p> <I>The Fractal Geometry of Nature</I> is a mathematics text. But buried in the deltas and lambdas and integrals, even a layperson can pick out and appreciate Mandelbrot's point: that somewhere in mathematics, there is an explanation for nature. It is not a coincidence that fractal math is so good at generating images of cliffs and shorelines and capillary beds.
BibTeX record
RIS record