CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

How repeatable are associations between polymorphisms in achaete-scute and bristle number variation in Drosophila? Export

Genetics (4 February 2007)

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


dpollard's tags for this article

association bristle polymorphism variation

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Currently, the relevance of common genetic variants--particularly those significantly associated with phenotypic variation in laboratory studies--to standing phenotypic variation in the wild is poorly understood. To address this, we quantified the relationship between achaete-scute complex (ASC) polymorphisms and Drosophila bristle number phenotypes in several new population samples. MC22 is a biallelic, nonrepetitive length polymorphism 97 bp downstream of the scute transcript. It has been previously shown to be associated with sternopleural bristle number variation in both sexes in a set of isogenic lines. We replicated this association in a large cohort of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster. We also detected a significant association at MC22 in an outbred population maintained under laboratory conditions for ~25 years, but the phenotypic effects in this sample were opposite from the direction estimated in the initial study. Finally, no significant associations were detected in a second large wild-caught cohort, or in a set of 134 Nearly Isogenic Lines. Our ability to repeat the initial association in wild samples suggests that it was not spurious. Nevertheless, inconsistent results from the other three panels suggest the relationship between polymorphic genetic markers and loci contributing to continuous variation is not a simple one.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.