![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
dragonrez's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
AML: immunophenotypic heterogeneity and prognostic significance of c-kit expression. |
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractAntigenic profiles in AML that have generally accepted prognostic significance, and allow treatment stratification, have not yet been defined. In a previous report of Ashman et al., the proto-oncogene c-kit defined by binding of the moab YB5.B8 was expressed on about one third of AML cases, mainly of the undifferentiated FAB-subtypes and associated with poor prognosis and overall survival. In this study, the moab 17F11 also directed against the c-kit structure stained 41/47 AML and 6/8 CML blast specimens, whereas all investigated 40 ALL samples were c-kit negative. c-kit was not restricted to any particular, undifferentiated FAB-subtype, but found in 9/9 AML-M0/M1, 18/19 AML-M2, 0/1 AML-M3, 11/13 AML-M4 and 3/5 AML-M5 subtypes. Immunophenotypical analysis showed no restriction of c-kit expression to immature, CD34+ precursors, but c-kit was also expressed on CD4+ CD34- precursor cells differentiating towards the monocyte lineage. In addition, multi-color labelings revealed an extraordinary heterogeneity of concomitant antigen expression on c-kit+ cells 10/36 c-kit+ CD34+ samples expressing CD56 and 16/36 c-kit+ CD34+ samples being CD7 positive; two c-kit+ CD34+ specimens carried the B-cell antigen CD19. In correlation to clinical outcome c-kit expression as single parameter was not predictive for poor response to therapy and short survival as previously suggested.
BibTeX record
RIS record