CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Triple Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Imaging and Clinical Characteristics

by: Kristin M. Krizmanich-Conniff, Chintana Paramagul, Stephanie K. Patterson, Mark A. Helvie, Marilyn A. Roubidoux, Jamie D. Myles, Kiting Jiang, Michael Sabel
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 199, No. 2. (1 August 2012), pp. 458-464, doi:10.2214/ajr.10.6096  Key: citeulike:11821019

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the imaging findings of patients with breast cancer negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)—so-called “triple receptor–negative cancer”—and to compare the mammographic findings and clinical characteristics of triple receptor–negative cancer with non–triple receptor–negative cancers (i.e., ER-positive, PR-positive, or HER2-positive or two of the three markers positive).CONCLUSION. Triple receptor–negative cancer was most commonly an irregular noncalcified mass with ill-defined or spiculated margins on mammography and a hypoechoic or complex mass with an irregular shape and noncircumscribed margins on ultrasound. Most triple receptor–negative cancers were discovered on physical examination. Compared with non–triple receptor–negative cancers, triple receptor–negative cancers were found in younger women and were a higher pathologic grade.


dsbcdoc1's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.