CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Assessment of Human Ocular Hemodynamics Export

Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 42, No. 6. (6 May 1998), pp. 509-533.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


eeruowl's tags for this article

retina

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Vascular abnormality and altered hemodynamics play important roles in many ophthalmic pathologies. Much of our knowledge of ocular hemodynamics was gained from invasive animal research, although a number of noninvasive methods suitable for in vivo use in humans have been developed. Data from these methods now produce a significant literature of their own. Understanding the origins of the data and appreciating their limitations can be difficult. Modern hemodynamic assessment techniques each examine a unique facet of the ocular circulation. No single facet provides a complete description of the hemodynamic state of the eye. These methods have contributed a great deal to our understanding of normal hemodynamics. More importantly, they continue to add to our understanding of altered hemodynamics found in disease. Some have found their way into limited clinical practice. The predominant ocular hemodynamic assessment techniques are reviewed with the aims of introducing the fundamental principles behind each, highlighting their inherent advantages and limitations, highlighting their contributions to understanding ocular physiology, and considering their potential to provide signs for diagnosis. (Surv Ophthalmol 42:509-533, 1998.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.