![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
eldan's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
The fallacy of general purpose bio-inspired computingby: Seth Bullock
edited by: Luis M. Rocha, Larry S. Yaeger, Mark A. Bedau, Dario Floreano, Robert L. Goldstone, Alessandro VespignaniIn Artificial Life X : Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (1 August 2006), pp. 540-545.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleArgues for the nichiversality of both biology and bio-inspired computing. Makes the point that a computing system being provably general in competence does not inform us as to its performance, or which sorts of tasks it is a _sensible choice_ for. Ironically, one of the drivers of bio-inspired computing has been the understanding that Turing machines, while provably universal, are a poor architectural choice for many tasks.
(additional level of irony: for the most part we institute our bio-inspired computing systems as models implemented on a Turing machine platform)
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
BibTeX record
RIS record