CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

P2P reputation management: Probabilistic estimation vs. social networks Export

Computer Networks In Management in Peer-to-Peer Systems, Vol. 50, No. 4. (15 March 2006), pp. 485-500.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


elsantosneto's tags for this article

496 ali ranking reputation

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

elsantosneto has 1 private note and 0 public notes for this article. If you are elsantosneto then you can log in to see the private note.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Managing trust is a key issue for a wide acceptance of P2P computing, particularly in critical areas such as e-commerce. Reputation-based trust management has been identified in the literature as a viable solution to the problem. The current work in the field can be roughly divided into two groups: social networks that rely on aggregating the entire available feedback in the network in hope achieving as much robustness against possible misbehavior as possible and probabilistic models that rely on the well known probabilistic estimation techniques but use only a limited fraction of the available feedback. In this paper we provide first an overview of these techniques and then a comprehensive comparison of the two classes of approaches. We test their performance against various classes of collusive peer behavior and analyze their properties with respect to the implementation costs they incur and trust semantics they offer to the decision makers.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.