Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. Export

@article{citeulike:2498933, abstract = {PURPOSE: To determine whether an appropriately designed computerized order entry system for radiology can be clinically accepted and influence ordering practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An intranet-based outpatient ordering and scheduling system was designed and implemented beginning in 2001. Indications used to request imaging have been standardized and keystrokes minimized by using menus. The system offers online scheduling and provides patient reminders, preparation instructions, and driving directions. Since November 2004, examination requests have been given utility scores on the basis of the indications provided. Comparative scores for other types of imaging examinations are displayed alongside the scores for the examinations requested. Physicians' performance is tracked, and senior clinicians counsel physicians with many low-scoring examinations. Data collected from the order entry system were used to evaluate rates of use, examinations with low "utility scores," and changes in the scores over the first year of use. RESULTS: The use of the order entry system has increased steadily, currently constituting 75\% of all potential outpatient studies. Since the addition of decision support in November 2004, almost 72,000 examinations have been scored. The highest number of low utility examinations were imaging of the spine, either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The percentage of low utility examinations declined from 6\% to 2\% overall. The amount of the decline was greatest for primary care physicians and for those who interacted with the computer themselves rather than through office staff members. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized order entry with decision support can be widely accepted by clinicians and can have an impact on ordering practices.}, address = {Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA. dirosenthal@partners.org}, author = {Rosenthal, D. I. and Weilburg, J. B. and Schultz, T. and Miller, J. C. and Nixon, V. and Dreyer, K. J. and Thrall, J. H.}, citeulike-article-id = {2498933}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17412171}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17412171}, doi = {10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006}, issn = {1558-349X}, journal = {J Am Coll Radiol}, keywords = {decision\_support, radiology, utilization}, month = {October}, number = {10}, pages = {799--806}, posted-at = {2008-03-10 05:03:02}, priority = {2}, title = {Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006}, volume = {3}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2498933 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2498933 N2 - PURPOSE: To determine whether an appropriately designed computerized order entry system for radiology can be clinically accepted and influence ordering practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An intranet-based outpatient ordering and scheduling system was designed and implemented beginning in 2001. Indications used to request imaging have been standardized and keystrokes minimized by using menus. The system offers online scheduling and provides patient reminders, preparation instructions, and driving directions. Since November 2004, examination requests have been given utility scores on the basis of the indications provided. Comparative scores for other types of imaging examinations are displayed alongside the scores for the examinations requested. Physicians' performance is tracked, and senior clinicians counsel physicians with many low-scoring examinations. Data collected from the order entry system were used to evaluate rates of use, examinations with low "utility scores," and changes in the scores over the first year of use. RESULTS: The use of the order entry system has increased steadily, currently constituting 75% of all potential outpatient studies. Since the addition of decision support in November 2004, almost 72,000 examinations have been scored. The highest number of low utility examinations were imaging of the spine, either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The percentage of low utility examinations declined from 6% to 2% overall. The amount of the decline was greatest for primary care physicians and for those who interacted with the computer themselves rather than through office staff members. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized order entry with decision support can be widely accepted by clinicians and can have an impact on ordering practices. IS - 10 JF - J Am Coll Radiol SN - 1558-349X AD - Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA. dirosenthal@partners.org EP - 806 TI - Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. VL - 3 SP - 799 KW - decision_support KW - radiology KW - utilization AU - Rosenthal, DI AU - Weilburg, JB AU - Schultz, T AU - Miller, JC AU - Nixon, V AU - Dreyer, KJ AU - Thrall, JH PY - 2006/10// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006 ER -