Interobserver variability in the interpretation of unenhanced helical CT for the diagnosis of ureteral stone disease. Export

@article{citeulike:3689173, abstract = {PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze interobserver agreement in the interpretation of unenhanced helical CT (UHCT) for the evaluation of ureteral stone disease and obstruction. METHOD: One hundred three UHCT examinations were independently and retrospectively reviewed by five readers including attending radiologists, a radiology resident, and an attending urologist. Examinations were interpreted as positive, negative, or indeterminate for ureteral stone disease and obstruction. The Cohen kappa test was used to measure interobserver agreement. The accuracy of the readers was also assessed. RESULTS: The kappa value ranged from 0.67 to 0.71 among the three attending radiologists and from 0.65 to 0.67 among the radiology attending physicians and radiology resident. Although the urologist tended to agree less well with the other readers (kappa range: 0.33-0.46), there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the accuracy among all five readers. The percentage of cases interpreted as indeterminate ranged from 8 to 25\% and almost invariably involved difficulty distinguishing phleboliths from minimally obstructing distal ureteral calculi. The percentage of UHCT scans correctly interpreted as positive and correctly interpreted as negative ranged from 73\% (n = 27) to 86\% (n = 32) and 63\% (n = 22) to 86\% (n = 30), respectively. CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was very good among the radiology attending physicians and resident and moderate with the urologist. The examination is an accurate technique in the evaluation of ureteral stone disease, although limitations exist, particularly in the diagnosis of minimally obstructing distal ureteral calculi.}, author = {Freed, K. S. and Paulson, E. K. and Frederick, M. G. and Preminger, G. M. and Shusterman, D. J. and Keogan, M. T. and Vieweg, J. and Smith, R. H. and Nelson, R. C. and Delong, D. M. and Leder, R. A.}, citeulike-article-id = {3689173}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9754108}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=9754108}, issn = {0363-8715}, journal = {Journal of computer assisted tomography}, keywords = {discrepancy, interpretation, residents, roc}, number = {5}, pages = {732--737}, posted-at = {2008-11-25 18:06:53}, priority = {2}, title = {Interobserver variability in the interpretation of unenhanced helical CT for the diagnosis of ureteral stone disease.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9754108}, volume = {22}, year = {1998} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3689173 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3689173 N2 - PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze interobserver agreement in the interpretation of unenhanced helical CT (UHCT) for the evaluation of ureteral stone disease and obstruction. METHOD: One hundred three UHCT examinations were independently and retrospectively reviewed by five readers including attending radiologists, a radiology resident, and an attending urologist. Examinations were interpreted as positive, negative, or indeterminate for ureteral stone disease and obstruction. The Cohen kappa test was used to measure interobserver agreement. The accuracy of the readers was also assessed. RESULTS: The kappa value ranged from 0.67 to 0.71 among the three attending radiologists and from 0.65 to 0.67 among the radiology attending physicians and radiology resident. Although the urologist tended to agree less well with the other readers (kappa range: 0.33-0.46), there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the accuracy among all five readers. The percentage of cases interpreted as indeterminate ranged from 8 to 25% and almost invariably involved difficulty distinguishing phleboliths from minimally obstructing distal ureteral calculi. The percentage of UHCT scans correctly interpreted as positive and correctly interpreted as negative ranged from 73% (n = 27) to 86% (n = 32) and 63% (n = 22) to 86% (n = 30), respectively. CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was very good among the radiology attending physicians and resident and moderate with the urologist. The examination is an accurate technique in the evaluation of ureteral stone disease, although limitations exist, particularly in the diagnosis of minimally obstructing distal ureteral calculi. IS - 5 JF - Journal of computer assisted tomography SN - 0363-8715 EP - 737 TI - Interobserver variability in the interpretation of unenhanced helical CT for the diagnosis of ureteral stone disease. VL - 22 SP - 732 KW - discrepancy KW - interpretation KW - residents KW - roc AU - Freed, KS AU - Paulson, EK AU - Frederick, MG AU - Preminger, GM AU - Shusterman, DJ AU - Keogan, MT AU - Vieweg, J AU - Smith, RH AU - Nelson, RC AU - Delong, DM AU - Leder, RA PY - 1998///t UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9754108 ER -