Genericity is conceptual, not semantic Export

@techreport{tr:genericity, abstract = {Abstract. Genericity is not encoded in the syntax semantics interface any more than metaphoricity is, or other forms of sense selection. We observe the overwhelming cross-linguistic lack of encoding of cues which could be understood as a signal of a particular semantic content. We note the ready compatibility of a range of syntactic forms with each of a range of conceptual distinctions one might make about generics. From these observations we argue that genericity is not an issue of semantics. We take the semantics of an expression to be the set of compositionally encoded set of meanings an expression may have. That a sentence may be understood as compatible with some concept that it does not express is not an issue of semantics, but of background conceptual structures or pragmatics. Proclivity to associate certain syntactic forms with certain types of genericity is a reinterpretation of distinctions that exist elsewhere in an exercise of synonymy avoidance. 1.}, author = {Vogel, Carl and Mcgillion, Michelle}, citeulike-article-id = {3449927}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.11.3955}, institution = {University of Dublin, Trinity College}, keywords = {conceptual, genericity}, month = {July}, posted-at = {2008-10-25 13:18:25}, priority = {2}, title = {Genericity is conceptual, not semantic}, url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.11.3955}, year = {2002} }

TY - RPRT ID - tr:genericity L3 - citeulike-article-id:3449927 N2 - Abstract. Genericity is not encoded in the syntax semantics interface any more than metaphoricity is, or other forms of sense selection. We observe the overwhelming cross-linguistic lack of encoding of cues which could be understood as a signal of a particular semantic content. We note the ready compatibility of a range of syntactic forms with each of a range of conceptual distinctions one might make about generics. From these observations we argue that genericity is not an issue of semantics. We take the semantics of an expression to be the set of compositionally encoded set of meanings an expression may have. That a sentence may be understood as compatible with some concept that it does not express is not an issue of semantics, but of background conceptual structures or pragmatics. Proclivity to associate certain syntactic forms with certain types of genericity is a reinterpretation of distinctions that exist elsewhere in an exercise of synonymy avoidance. 1. TI - Genericity is conceptual, not semantic KW - conceptual KW - genericity AU - Vogel, Carl AU - Mcgillion, Michelle PY - 2002/07// UR - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.11.3955 ER -