CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

A Comparison of Methods for Analysing a Nested Frailty Model to Child Survival in Malawi

by: Samuel O. M. Manda
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Vol. 43, No. 1. (2001), pp. 7-16, doi:10.1111/1467-842x.00150  Key: citeulike:11339793

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Demographic and Health Surveys collect child survival times that are clustered at the family and community levels. It is assumed that each cluster has a specific, unobservable, random frailty that induces an association in the survival times within the cluster. The Cox proportional hazards model, with family and community random frailties acting multiplicatively on the hazard rate, is presented. The estimation of the fixed effect and the association parameters of the modified model is then examined using the Gibbs sampler and the expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm. The methods are compared using child survival data collected in the 1992 Demographic and Health Survey of Malawi. The two methods lead to very similar estimates of fixed effect parameters. However, the estimates of random effect variances from the EM algorithm are smaller than those of the Gibbs sampler. Both estimation methods reveal considerable family variation in the survival of children, and very little variability over the communities.


federicorotolo's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.