CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

The different conceptions of catatonia: historical overview and critical discussion.

by: B. Pfuhlmann, G. Stöber
European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, Vol. 251 Suppl 1 (2001)  Key: citeulike:12154502

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The present article outlines the different conception of catatonia from its initial description by Kahlbaum to current viewpoints. Originally considered to be an independent disease entity characterized by mental and motor abnormalities, catatonia was later viewed as a subtype of schizophrenia as it is the case in current classifications like ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Since catatonic symptoms were observable not only in schizophrenic psychoses, but also in affective, somatic or even psychogenic disorders, many researchers today consider catatonia as a nosologically unspecific syndrome. In the end, the traditional conceptions did not succeed in defining catatonia as a clinically homogeneous and valid diagnosis. An independent conception was elaborated by the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard school of psychiatry. Based on a precise differentiation of psychomotor disturbances, two essentially different forms of catatonic psychoses have been separated, systematic and periodic catatonias which differ in symptomatology, prognosis and treatment.


filipmarcinowski's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.