![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
fuyu1008's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Achieving <i>k</i>-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppressionby: Latanya Sweeney
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractOften a data holder, such as a hospital or bank, needs to share person-specific records in such a way that the identities of the individuals who are the subjects of the data cannot be determined. One way to achieve this is to have the released records adhere to k - anonymity, which means each released record has at least ( k -1) other records in the release whose values are indistinct over those fields that appear in external data. So, k - anonymity provides privacy protection by guaranteeing that each released record will relate to at least k individuals even if the records are directly linked to external information. This paper provides a formal presentation of combining generalization and suppression to achieve k -anonymity. Generalization involves replacing (or recoding) a value with a less specific but semantically consistent value. Suppression involves not releasing a value at all. The Preferred Minimal Generalization Algorithm (MinGen), which is a theoretical algorithm presented herein, combines these techniques to provide k -anonymity protection with minimal distortion. The real-world algorithms Datafly and µ-Argus are compared to MinGen. Both Datafly and µ-Argus use heuristics to make approximations, and so, they do not always yield optimal results. It is shown that Datafly can over distort data and µ-Argus can additionally fail to provide adequate protection.
BibTeX record
RIS record