CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes

by: Catrin T. Smith, Paula R. Williamson, Anthony G. Marson
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 11, No. 5. (October 2005), pp. 468-478, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00559.x  Key: citeulike:319851

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Combining the results of individual studies using meta-analysis may be undertaken using either aggregate data (AD) or individual patient data (IPD). In any meta-analysis it is important to consider statistical heterogeneity between studies. Potential sources of heterogeneity can be explored using regression models with either AD or IPD. An overview of approaches and empirical assessment of how the results and conclusions differ from these analyses is undertaken using a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials comparing two antiepileptic drugs with time-to-event outcomes. Alternative meta-regression models using AD are compared to stratified Cox regression models using IPD. Age as a potential cause of heterogeneity is detected by both AD and IPD regression models. Time from first ever seizure to randomization is only identified by some AD models. A more thorough explanation of heterogeneity is obtained from the model using IPD but further empirical evidence comparing IPD and AD results are needed.


gareth's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.