We will interpret your continued use of this site as
your acceptance of our use of cookies. You may
hide this message.
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register
and you can start organising your references online.
Tags
An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes
To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor,
select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 11, No. 5. (October 2005), pp. 468-478, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00559.x Key: citeulike:319851
Formatted Citation
Show HTML
Likes
(beta)
This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.
Combining the results of individual studies using meta-analysis may be undertaken using either aggregate data (AD) or individual patient data (IPD). In any meta-analysis it is important to consider statistical heterogeneity between studies. Potential sources of heterogeneity can be explored using regression models with either AD or IPD. An overview of approaches and empirical assessment of how the results and conclusions differ from these analyses is undertaken using a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials comparing two antiepileptic drugs with time-to-event outcomes. Alternative meta-regression models using AD are compared to stratified Cox regression models using IPD. Age as a potential cause of heterogeneity is detected by both AD and IPD regression models. Time from first ever seizure to randomization is only identified by some AD models. A more thorough explanation of heterogeneity is obtained from the model using IPD but further empirical evidence comparing IPD and AD results are needed.
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.