Please help support CiteULike by taking part in our survey.
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Body mass definitions of obesity: sensitivity and specificity using self-reported weight and height. Export

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), Vol. 1, No. 2. (March 1990), pp. 146-152.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

A high correlation between continuous measures of self-reported and measured weight and height has led investigators to infer that self-report of these variables is appropriate in epidemiologic studies. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of categorical definitions of body mass defined using self-reported height and weight on 7,455 adult participants of the Lipid Research Clinics Family Study (1975-1978) on whom both self-reported and measured height and weight were available. The categorical definition of obesity used here was a body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2. Overall, the sensitivity of the obese category when defined with self-reported weight and height was 74% (95% CI = 72%-76%), and the specificity was 99%. The sensitivities of the categories defined using self-reported measures varied considerably by sex, age, and educational level. Overall, the sensitivities were higher for women compared with men, as men were less accurate in reporting height. The sensitivity of the categorical definitions of obesity decreased with increasing age and education in both men and women. The sensitivity for elderly obese men was below 50%. These results suggest that substantial misclassification can occur when self-reported information is used to define body mass categories.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.