CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Object Naming, Vocabulary Growth, and the Development of Word Retrieval Abilities Export

Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 46, No. 4. (May 2002), pp. 665-687.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


gcrost's tags for this article

preschool-age word-finding word-learning

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Previous research suggests that during a time of rapid growth in productive vocabulary, children are especially susceptible to errors of retrieval. These errors consist of words known to the child and often involve the incorrect selection of a previously said word. Two experiments investigated changes in lexical access and naming in the context of learning new words. Experiment 1 examined the rise and fall of children's naming errors for practiced and unpracticed words during the initial period of accelerated vocabulary growth. Findings indicated that as individual words were practiced in production, those words became stronger and more resistant to interference from lexical competitors. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that retrieval errors occur as a result of a general fragility of all words in the child's nascent lexicon. Experiment 2 investigated the related hypothesis that children's increased vulnerability to error is specific to the period of initial word learning. The results showed that older, more experienced word learners exhibited proportionately fewer errors when acquiring a set of novel words than novice word learners. However, the source of the error was similar, suggesting that common processing mechanisms may underlie the acquisition of a productive lexicon.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.