Automated surveillance for adverse drug events at a community hospital and an academic medical center. Export

@article{citeulike:3484558, abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To compare the rates and nature of ADEs at an academic medical center and a community hospital using a single computerized ADE surveillance system. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients admitted to two tertiary care hospitals. Outcome Measure Adverse drug events identified by automated surveillance and voluntary reporting. METHODS: We implemented an automated surveillance system across an academic medical center and a community hospital. Potential events identified by the computer were reviewed in detail by medication safety pharmacists and scored for causality and severity. Findings were compared between the two hospitals, and with voluntary reports from nurses and pharmacists. RESULTS: Over the 8 month study period, 25,177 patients were admitted to the university hospital and 8,029 to the community hospital. There were 1,116 ADEs in 900 patients at the university hospital for an overall rate of 4.4 ADEs per 100 admissions. At the community hospital, 399 patients experienced 501 ADEs for a rate of 6.2 events per 100 admissions. Rates of antibiotic-associated colitis, drug-induced hypoglycemia, and anticoagulation-related ADEs were significantly higher at the community hospital compared with the university hospital. Computerized surveillance detected ADEs at a rate 3.6 times that of voluntary reporting at the university hospital and 12.3 times that at the community hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Operation of a common automated ADE surveillance system across hospitals permits meaningful comparison of ADE rates in different inpatient settings. Automated surveillance detects ADEs at rates far higher than voluntary reporting, and the difference may be greater in the community hospital setting. Community hospitals may experience higher rates of certain types of ADEs compared with academic medical centers.}, author = {Kilbridge, P. M. and Campbell, U. C. and Cozart, H. B. and Mojarrad, M. G.}, citeulike-article-id = {3484558}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2069}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622159}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=16622159}, doi = {10.1197/jamia.M2069}, issn = {1067-5027}, journal = {Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA}, keywords = {adverse, drug, eprescribing, events}, number = {4}, pages = {372--377}, posted-at = {2008-11-06 14:04:42}, priority = {2}, title = {Automated surveillance for adverse drug events at a community hospital and an academic medical center.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2069}, volume = {13}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3484558 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3484558 N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare the rates and nature of ADEs at an academic medical center and a community hospital using a single computerized ADE surveillance system. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients admitted to two tertiary care hospitals. Outcome Measure Adverse drug events identified by automated surveillance and voluntary reporting. METHODS: We implemented an automated surveillance system across an academic medical center and a community hospital. Potential events identified by the computer were reviewed in detail by medication safety pharmacists and scored for causality and severity. Findings were compared between the two hospitals, and with voluntary reports from nurses and pharmacists. RESULTS: Over the 8 month study period, 25,177 patients were admitted to the university hospital and 8,029 to the community hospital. There were 1,116 ADEs in 900 patients at the university hospital for an overall rate of 4.4 ADEs per 100 admissions. At the community hospital, 399 patients experienced 501 ADEs for a rate of 6.2 events per 100 admissions. Rates of antibiotic-associated colitis, drug-induced hypoglycemia, and anticoagulation-related ADEs were significantly higher at the community hospital compared with the university hospital. Computerized surveillance detected ADEs at a rate 3.6 times that of voluntary reporting at the university hospital and 12.3 times that at the community hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Operation of a common automated ADE surveillance system across hospitals permits meaningful comparison of ADE rates in different inpatient settings. Automated surveillance detects ADEs at rates far higher than voluntary reporting, and the difference may be greater in the community hospital setting. Community hospitals may experience higher rates of certain types of ADEs compared with academic medical centers. IS - 4 JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA SN - 1067-5027 EP - 377 TI - Automated surveillance for adverse drug events at a community hospital and an academic medical center. VL - 13 SP - 372 KW - adverse KW - drug KW - eprescribing KW - events AU - Kilbridge, PM AU - Campbell, UC AU - Cozart, HB AU - Mojarrad, MG PY - 2006///g UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2069 ER -