![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
greg_restall's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Structure of proofs and the complexity of cut eliminationby: Wenhui Zhang
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe importance of the structure of cut-formulas with respect to proof length and proof depth has been studied in various occasions. It has been illustrated that a quantifier may be more powerful than a binary connective in cut-formulas with respect to the reduction (or increase) of proof length and proof depth, and a sequence of quantifiers of the same type (existential or universal) may be less powerful than a sequence of quantifiers of alternating types. This paper provides a refined view on cut-elimination through an analysis of the structure of proofs, brings new insight into the relation between cut-formulas and short proofs, and illustrates that a mixture of quantifiers and binary connectives could be important for achieving the maximal benefit of cut-formulas for obtaining short proofs.
BibTeX record
RIS record