CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Indel-Based Evolutionary Distance and MouseâHuman Divergence Export

Genome Research, Vol. 14, No. 8. (1 August 2004), pp. 1610-1616.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


gregoryross's tags for this article

intron length

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

10.1101/gr.2450504 We propose a method for estimating the evolutionary distance between DNA sequences in terms of insertions and deletions (indels), defined as the per site number of indels accumulated in the course of divergence of the two sequences. We derive a maximal likelihood estimate of this distance from differences between lengths of orthologous introns or other segments of sequences delimited by conservative markers. When indels accumulate, lengths of orthologous introns diverge only slightly slower than linearly, because long indels occur with substantial frequencies. Thus, saturation is not a major obstacle for estimating indel-based evolutionary distance. For introns of medium lengths, our method recovers the known evolutionary distance between rat and mouse, 0.014 indels per site, with good precision. We estimate that mouseâhuman divergence exceeds ratâmouse divergence by a factor of 4, so that mouseâhuman evolutionary distance in terms of selectively neutral indels is 0.056. Because in mammals, indels are â¼14 times less frequent than nucleotide substitutions, mouseâhuman evolutionary distance in terms of selectively neutral substitutions is â¼0.8.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.