CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Quantifying the effects of roughness scattering on reflection loss measurements

by: Marcia J. Isakson, Nicholas P. Chotiros, R. Abraham Yarbrough, James N. Piper
Vol. 132, No. 6. (01 December 2012), pp. 3687-3697, doi:10.1121/1.4765304  Key: citeulike:11898270

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Seafloor reflection loss and roughness measurements were taken at the Experimental Validation of Acoustic Modeling Techniques experiment in 2006. The magnitude and phase of the reflection loss was measured at frequencies from 5 to 80 kHz and grazing angles from 7° to 77°. Approximately 1500 samples were taken for each angle. The roughness was measured with a laser profiler. Geoacoustic parameters such as water and sediment sound speed and density were measured concurrently. The reflection loss data were compared with three models: A flat interface elastic model based on geoacoustic measurements; a flat interface poro-elastic model based on the Biot/Stoll model; and a rough interface model based on the measured interface roughness power spectrum. The data were most consistent with the poro-elastic model including scattering. The elastic model consistently predicted values for the reflection loss which were higher than measured. The data exhibited more variability than the model due to layering and fluctuations in the propagating medium.


gtaralds's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.