CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

The mean does not mean as much anymore: finding sub-groups for tailored therapeutics.

by: Stephen J. Ruberg, Lei Chen, Yanping Wang
Clinical trials (London, England), Vol. 7, No. 5. (1 October 2010), pp. 574-583, doi:10.1177/1740774510369350  Key: citeulike:7894768

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The genomics revolution is still in its infancy, and there is much to learn about how to transform biological knowledge into useful medicines to further public health. At the bedside, we are asking how and why individual patients respond to different drug treatments in different ways. In addition to genetic mechanisms, there are many clinical markers (e.g. medical history, disease severity) as well as social/environmental factors (e.g. smoking habits) that can be used to identify who may or may not respond to treatment. This issue has some considerable statistical complexity, and different approaches to the analysis of clinical trials may yield more interesting insights into the problem. Novel applications of statistical methods will be discussed, and examples will be used to demonstrate sub-group identification. In order to evaluate many potential predictors of response, we use recursive partitioning methods to identify predictor variables and their cut-off values to define sub-groups of patients with differential treatment response. Validation of this variable/model selection approach was done using independent data from other clinical trials. In one example, a classification tree was developed using baseline measures to define important sub-groups of patients that responded much better than the overall mean response in the study. In a second example, a classification tree was built based on measures of response early in treatment to predict longer-term responders and nonresponders. Limitation Classification algorithms can be prone to over-fitting, and validation of results is an important consideration. Obviously, analyses are limited by the available predictor variables. Using classification trees proved to be very useful in evaluating large numbers of potential predictors to find sub-groups of patients with exceptional response. The method is easy to use, and clinicians can easily interpret and implement results. This approach can be helpful in tailoring treatments to individual patients.


guhjy's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.